Question
A quality director has six improvement opportunities on the table but funding for only two projects this cycle. Leadership asks for a defensible way to choose. What should the director apply first?
Tap card to flipAnswer
An impact/effort prioritization matrix (or a Pareto analysis of contributing frequency) scores each candidate against consistent criteria such as patient safety impact, feasibility, and strategic alignment, so the two funded projects are chosen by documented rationale rather than by whichever manager argues loudest. Skipping this step and picking by intuition or politics risks funding low-yield work while a higher-impact opportunity goes unaddressed, and it leaves the director unable to defend the choice later if results disappoint.
Tap card to flip back